|
Interrupting Silence, Because “Voices Carry”
Lynda L. Hinkle
I’ve
been listening to the song “Voices Carry” by Til Tuesday for over
20 years, and yet it did not strike me until this morning what an
extraordinary feminist text it really is. A vulnerable-sounding
female narrator bemoans the angry authority of a mysterious male
figure. Even she does not understand his intentions, as she says:
In
the dark I like to read his mind
But
I’m frightened of the things I might find.
She
feels that she loves him, but he keeps her locked in silence, hushing
her and telling her to keep it down. The song reaches a crescendo
where she realizes the futility of the power dynamic in this relationship,
and she cries out in anguish:
He
wants me! But only part of the time!
He
wants me! If he can keep me in line!”
You
can taste the rising anger as she uses not her words, but repeats
his in trying to free herself:
He
said shut up! He said shut up!
Oh
God can’t you keep it down! Voices carry…
Oh
hush…voices carry…”
She
ends the song by finally expressing her own thoughts, her own feelings
independent of this male authority, “I wish he would let me talk.”
Feminism
is largely about interrupting the silence imposed on the female
voice by the mysterious disembodied voice of patriarchy that wants
us, “part of the time…if he can keep [us] in line.” Of course
in the language of backlash, many men resent the implication that
it is they that silence women’s voices. Indeed, I have met
many men who feel deeply threatened by that implication. But
Patriarchy is a system, brothers and sisters…not an individual.
It is a system that silences women and men to keep them from escaping
firmly entrenched gender ideals, to keep them from achieving our
potential as human beings by disallowing diversity and creativity
in order to maintain itself and its economic determinism.
In
the 1960’s, Betty Friedan wrote about “the problem that has no name”,
the ennui and unrest created by the power inequity experienced by
the middle class suburban housewife. Her book “The Feminine
Mystique” spoke into the silence and helped spark the second wave
of feminism. The power of speaking as a means of crushing
Patriarchy is continually reinforced by the number of books that
have motivated, driven and fueled the feminist movement. My
feminist awakening in the 1990’s was spoken into being by people
like Naomi Wolf, author of The Beauty Myth and Susan Faludi,
author of Backlash. I can scarcely forget seeing Susan
Faludi speak at a local college, her petite frame enveloped in a
conservative navy blue suit -- she hardly seemed like a lion until
she opened her mouth and sent chills through the audience of young
women with her silence-smashing roar.
Words
are our power.
In
her essay, “Voice
and Silence: A feminist model of autobiographical memory”,
Robyn Fivush, a professor at Emory University, writes
From
the feminist concept of place, voice and silence must be seen
as dynamic and relational. Voice and silence will emerge within
the individual as a function of their historic and cultural place
and their individual history of specific interactions with specific
others. The way in which individuals develop voice or silence
will have important implications for the development of an autobiographical
life story. Experiences that are voiced provide a sense of validation;
experiences are accepted as real and the individual’s perspective
on the experience is viewed as appropriate. Experiences
that are silenced lead to a sense of existential despair; experiences
are not heard or the individual’s perspective on the experience
is not accepted as appropriate. (8)
In
fact, until we have voiced them into being, our experiences are
hushed into non-existence.
The
Til’ Tuesday song says we fear what we might find in the male
mind: " In
the dark I like to read his mind. But I’m frightened of the things
I might find."
But
are we not also frightened of the things we might find in our
own minds? What might happen if we all speak our demons into flesh
and face them honestly? What might happen if we speak our feminist
truth with all its ugly not-so-politically-correct subtexts and
deal with what lies beneath? Do we really “wish he would let [us]
talk” or are we secretly relieved that no one is interrupting
our silence?
After
all, aren’t we complicit in our silencing when we do not even
try to speak?
Voices,
after all, do carry.
In
this issue of MP, we have endeavored to collect papers on subjects
upon which there is typically silence. We are interrupting
the silence in the hopes that our readers will take the challenge,
and go speak their stories too.
|